John Doe 2 v. N.C. State Univ., No. 23-2073 (4th Cir.)

When a coach reported that he worried an athletic trainer was engaging in “sexual grooming” of male student-athletes, the school reduced (but did not eliminate) his access to students. Predictably, the trainer later assaulted John Doe (and others) under the guise of providing medical treatment. With Public Justice, All Rise represents John in seeking fair inferences about the school’s knowledge based on the trainer’s reassignment following the report.

View Brief

Update: All Rise has won, read the opinion.

Previous
Previous

Title IX Rule litigation (several fora)

Next
Next

M.L. v. Concord, No. 22-1830 (1st Cir.)