Thomas v. Nino, Nos. 23-40385 (5th Cir.)

All Rise filed an amicus brief on behalf of the National Police Accountability project, explaining why the PLRA does not support an atextual requirement that incarcerated litigants show that they suffered a more than de minimus injury—a requirement the Supreme Court itself has rejected. It also explains why such a requirement has wrongful downstream consequences to litigants because of the three-strikes rule.

View Brief

Previous
Previous

Rush v. Nicoletti, No. 21-1298 (3d Cir.)

Next
Next

Gilmore v. Georgia DOC, No. 23-10343 (11th Cir.)